I’ve just finished reading the book by David Hillson and Ruth
Murray-Webster “A Short Guide to Risk Appetite”. This post dedicating to all Women around the World. Wish you to make good decisions in risky and important situations! Happy International Women Day!
Ruth Murray-Webster is a highly-qualified and respected business
consultant, with broad experience in managing organizational change in a
cross-cultural context and across a wide range of sectors, and a particular
interest in the human aspects of effective change management.
I really like her concept of a hamburger expressed in a book from the
same series: “ A Short Guide to Facilitating Risk Management” written together
with Penny Pullan (another great expert on risk management). They propose a
burger model for facilitating the risk process where the meat represents the work
content (the actual risks), the bun – facilitation process and some lettuce and
slices of tomato represent the knowledge of risk management and the ability to
challenge risks. Great risk facilitators stay vegetarian. They focus on the
facilitation process and the risk management process, but stay out of the “meat”
of the work content.
After a short presentation of these two great ladies let’s introduce David
Hillson, a recognized global authority on risk management, with a reputation
and track record of blending leading-edge
thinking with practical expert
application.
And for me David is the risk management Guru, number one in the World. I
can even call him my mentor – have a chance to meet him in person on a few occasions
and now follow him virtually (webinars, presentations, interviews) and through
reading his books. What I like the best about him is his talent to talk about complicated
concepts in a simple way – watch the interview recording and you will understand
what I mean.
SWOT - my first lesson by David |
When I teach risk management I always quote David or present his
concepts. What do you think about this risk definition? Great, isn’t it?
risk = uncertainty that matters (can affect
project objectives)
Hillson and Murray-Webster, 2007
I always try to encourage people to indentify positive and negative
risks, as they both matter and need to be managed proactively. I’ve used the
word try because have failed on a few occasions.
And without his risk meta language I would not be able to explain the
difference between risk, risk source and risk impact, as it’s easy to confuse
risk with cause or effect.
Example: The project is using the new technology
(cause/fact). This means we might not be able to assess the
project duration properly (uncertainty/ risk). The project would/could
take longer than the Sponsor expects (effect/possible result). Helpful? I think
so, especially for less experience PMs. I have seen many risk registers with
wrongly defined risks – for sure these people did not know the risk meta language.
Let’s come back to the “A Short Guide to Risk Appetite” book, which I recommend
for everyone, not only for Project Managers. We all need to answer “How much
risk should we take?” and other risky questions in our lives.We can apply the same concept of decision taking, no matter if this is “My
decision”, the “Operational Decision”, the “Strategic Decision” or the “Community
Decision”. In the book a practical RARA Model has been presented, which explains
the complementary and crucial roles of Risk
Appetite and Risk Attitude.
When I started reading this book I got lost with all these regulators’,
standard bodies’, professional associations’ and consultants’ definitions of
risk appetite and other risk–related concepts – believe me, most of them very
confusing. Almost wanted to give up, but because trust David decided to continue.
And do not regret it, as the authors walked me through all these complicated
concepts in a simple manner, giving so many examples, and in the end of the journey
I was able to explain it myself. And what’s the most important I not only know
the definitions but also understand how to use it in my life, so my next risky decision
will be taken with the support of RARA.
So:
- How much risk do we
usually like to take? = Risk
propensity (skłonność in Polish) – tendency of an individual to take
risk in general / Risk culture –
shared beliefs, values and knowledge of a group about risk.
- How much risk do we want
to take? = Risk appetite – the tendency
of an individual or group to take risk in a given situation.
- How much risk can we
take? = Risk capacity – ability
of an entity to bear risk, quantified against objectives.
- How much risk do we think
we are taking? = Risk perception
- How much risk do we think
we should take?= Risk attitude –
the chosen response (that’s
the main difference between attitude and appetite, which in not chosen) to
a given risky situation, influenced by risk perception
- How much risk we are
taking? = Risk exposure
Some more
definitions:
Risk
preferences = those aspects of an individual’s personality and motivation that influence
their risk propensity
Risk
thresholds = quantified measures that represent upper and lower limits of
acceptable uncertainty against each objectives.
Risk
tolerance = the acceptable variance around an objective (an alternative expression
of risk thresholds)
Hopefully this book will help you to make good decisions in risky and
important situations!
No comments:
Post a Comment